<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>ModulaHub</title><link>https://modulahub.com/</link><description>A structured reference for modular products, suppliers and construction methods.</description><language>en</language><item><title>When should a supplier’s product range have separate entries?</title><link>https://modulahub.com/articles/when-should-a-suppliers-product-range-have-separate-entries/</link><guid>https://modulahub.com/articles/when-should-a-suppliers-product-range-have-separate-entries/</guid><description>A supplier’s range should be split into separate system entries when its products have distinct assessed scopes or materially different assemblies and uses. Keep the supplier identity once, then link each system record to its own current identifier, assessment document, scope and limitations. NSAI’s register lists Castleforms Ltd against two named systems and certificates: ICF Therm Wall System, 22/0431, and Raft Therm System, 23/0434. The certificates describe different assemblies, so a single undifferentiated product entry would blur what each document covers. [1] [2] [3]</description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Volumetric or panelized: classify what leaves the factory</title><link>https://modulahub.com/articles/volumetric-or-panelized-start-with-the-system/</link><guid>https://modulahub.com/articles/volumetric-or-panelized-start-with-the-system/</guid><description>Classify a construction system by the physical assembly that leaves the factory: a volumetric system delivers three-dimensional structural modules, while a panelized system delivers two-dimensional structural panels. Then record separately what is fitted or completed in the factory and what remains for site teams. The UK Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) framework distinguishes these systems by form and structural role, but the label alone does not describe their degree of completion. [1] [2] [3]</description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>How to record a correction to a technical source</title><link>https://modulahub.com/articles/how-to-record-a-correction-to-a-technical-source/</link><guid>https://modulahub.com/articles/how-to-record-a-correction-to-a-technical-source/</guid><description>When a technical source is corrected, update the affected reference field and keep the earlier document in the record as superseded evidence. Record the replacement document’s identifier and issue date, the date your entry changed, and what changed in the record. Do not imply that a technical value changed unless comparison of both documents confirms it. EOTA’s ETA register distinguishes assessments described as currently valid from former versions held in a separate superseded database, which makes status and version part of the source trail. [1] [4]</description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>How to distinguish structural modules from bathroom pods</title><link>https://modulahub.com/articles/how-to-distinguish-structural-modules-from-bathroom-pods/</link><guid>https://modulahub.com/articles/how-to-distinguish-structural-modules-from-bathroom-pods/</guid><description>A directory should classify an offsite unit by its role in the building’s primary structure, then record its room completion and supplied scope in separate fields. A three-dimensional module that forms part of the building’s primary structural system belongs in a structural system category. A bathroom pod that does not form the building structure belongs in a non-structural assembly category. A handling or lifting frame is not, by itself, evidence of a primary structural role. [1] [3]</description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>